barnes maze behavioral circular apparatus (San Diego Instruments)
Structured Review

Barnes Maze Behavioral Circular Apparatus, supplied by San Diego Instruments, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/barnes maze behavioral circular apparatus/product/San Diego Instruments
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Effect of High-Salt Diet on Memory and Behavior in Mice Expressing Human Apolipoprotein Epsilon-4 (APOE4) Allele"
Article Title: Effect of High-Salt Diet on Memory and Behavior in Mice Expressing Human Apolipoprotein Epsilon-4 (APOE4) Allele
Journal: NeuroSci
doi: 10.3390/neurosci7020043
Figure Legend Snippet: Memory and learning: the male and female APOE3 and APOE4 mice were trained, and their memory and learning abilities were determined by the Barnes maze test. The bars represent latency to target hole (sec) data as the mean ± SE on normal-salt (0.4%), low-salt (0.1% NaCl) ( A ) and high-salt (4% NaCl) ( B ) diets, n = 7 in the low-salt treatment groups and n = 9 in the high-salt treatment groups. No sex differences were observed. Significance was calculated by Two-way ANOVA, followed by Bonferroni multiple comparison tests (* p < 0.05).
Techniques Used: Comparison
Figure Legend Snippet: Memory in APOE3 and APOE4: 72 h after the 4th training day, memory to reach the target hole was measured by the Barnes maze test. Primary latency ( A , B ), primary errors ( C , D ), total nose pokes ( E , F ), and distance traveled ( G , H ) were measured. Each bar represents data as the mean ± SE, and n = 7 in the low-salt treatment groups and n = 9 in the high-salt treatment groups. No sex differences were observed. Significance was calculated by Two-way ANOVA, followed by Bonferroni multiple comparison tests. (* p < 0.05).
Techniques Used: Comparison
![Primary latency, defined as the time required for a mouse to reach the target hole for the first time, was measured in wild-type (WT, open squares) and APP/PS1 transgenic (TG, filled squares) mice during three consecutive training days (five trials per day) in the <t>Barnes</t> <t>maze.</t> At 6 and 12 months of age, no significant differences in primary latency were observed between WT and TG mice, indicating preserved learning performance. At 18 months, TG mice exhibited significantly longer latencies compared to age-matched WT controls on training days 1 and 2 ( P <0.01; LSD post hoc test). The insets show mean primary latency (±SEM) for each training day across ages, with 18-month-old TG mice performing worse than 6-month-old animals. Repeated-measures ANOVA confirmed significant main effects of genotype [F(1,51)=4.7; P <0.05] and significant trial day x age interaction effects on the primary latency of TG and WT animals [F(2,51)=7.5; P <0.01]. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 9-11 per group).](https://bio-rxiv-images-cdn.bioz.com/dois_ending_with_74/10__64898_slash_2025__12__06__689974/10__64898_slash_2025__12__06__689974___F1.large.jpg)
